|
SIGNPOSTS AND WAYMARKS
by Chris Beney
[minor update December 2011]
Comment
is sought from readers about signposting and waymarking issues.
The writer believes that some highway authorities fail to understand the law
(indeed in an otherwise good statement of the law even the Ramblers' Association
until recently has
fluffed this one). This means that
performance targets may be claimed to have been met when they actually
haven't. The purposes of signposting include telling the public that they may go
along a certain way, telling them where the way goes to, and
enabling them to follow the route there without getting lost.
The requirement of the Countryside Act 1968 is for signposts to be put up wherever a
path leaves a metalled road and showing, so far as the highway authority
consider convenient and appropriate, where the path leads, and the distances
to these places. Convenient and appropriate presumably means to the public, not to the
highway authority, though I fear those words do get misunderstood.
Would it ever not
be convenient and appropriate to the public to have destination and
distance on the signs? Yes of course, for example a short path across a corner
of a green, or a short alleyway, but rarely for a path of any length. And in
fulfilment of their duty one
would expect a highway authority in such cases to record their reasons and make them
publicly available. The Countryside Act also imposes a duty on the
highway authority to provide such waymarks as the highway authority believes
are required to assist people unfamiliar with the locality in
following the route of the path. That duty must surely require the authority to
consider and decide on each path. |