BADFA home page
to Legal page
Return to Phil Wadey's talk on Creation
Widths and Widths, what is the difference?
by cb
The width of paths is often considered, particularly by local council officers, to be the width showing on the ground, whether it is the walked width (the beaten track), the hardened surface, or in the urban context the tarmac track. 1.8 metres is a typical standard width for this.

But in fact this is rarely the actual (legal) width of paths.

In the urban context Leicester County had a 1.8 metre path policy but it also normally required three metres of grass on either side. So the effective path width was 7.8 metres, nearly 25 feet.

If 1.8 metres were made the legal width then, as with any path, it could be fenced in by landowners with six and a half foot high security fences to that width without any permission being needed. This is quite horrid and when considering widths of paths the overall width not the hardened width should always be thought of.

Return to Phil Wadey's talk on Creation

top of page