News. Walks Law Unrecorded Ways Membership Works Reviews Comment Paths Path Issues BADFA home page Word search Latest updates Links Path Structures People
On many modern browsers holding down the CTRL key and using the mouse wheel allows sizing these pages to suit

 
BADFA's Year 2007 News  
For news from other years use News Index

# BADFA responds to Ramblers' Association consultation
# BADFA responds to path closure consultation
# House of lords defeat paths threat
# Welsh Office listens to BADFA
# Bluebells need your help
# Photo Competition launched
# BADFA influences Government Guidelines.
 
BADFA responds to Ramblers' Association consultation
3 Sept 2007
Our chairman, Chris Beney was responding to an important Ramblers' Association consultation on the way forward in his own name when he realised that BADFA would take the same line. Since BADFA is affiliated to the Ramblers' Association, we made the submission jointly. The Ramblers aims are a little bit more restricted than BADFA's, they work primarily for walkers but we cover all types of path user. But we have a lot in common nevertheless.
Our response may be seen here (PDF)

Top of Page

BADFA responds to path closure consultation
31August 2007

 The Countryside and Rights of Way Act of 2000 made provision for certain landholders to apply to divert or stop up paths. They could do so anyway but there was no pressure on highway authorities to consider the request, let alone grant it.
We would have been happy with legislation that required authorities to consider the request if it included measures that left the path network as good or better than before, after all that is only fair where private landhold gain is involved. But no, the law about to come in forces authorities to consider requests and makes it much more difficult to refuse actually making such orders.
Defra has just consulted on this prior to taking action. BADFA has replied to that and our full response may be seen here (PDF)

Top of Page

House of Lords unanimously defeat paths threat
20 June 2007

The house of lords today have published their judgment in the Godmanchester case. Lower courts had appeared to have so strengthened the power of a landowner to defeat a statutory claim to a right of way by long usage that a vast number of pending claims would have been lost. The full judgement is at:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd070620/godman-1.htm   or the PDF version at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldjudgmt/jd070620/godman.pdf


The Ramblers' Association and others are to be congratulated in funding this appeal to the house of lords.
BADFA had made a modest cash contribution to the legal costs appeal.
Top of Page

Welsh Office listens to BADFA
22 April 2007
We don't often communicate with the Welsh Office, but on the law regarding improving structures across public paths, we consider that any Government proposals or edicts on the topic may well affect the rules in the whole of the UK including our area of South West Herts.

So when they consulted on the guidelines we made detailed response. Naturally not all we suggested got into the final document, but some of what we did was indeed incorporated. One item was that the law seemed to allow structures to be improved by agreement, but didn't allow them to be completely removed by agreement. We had suggested that the British Standard for path structures, BS5709, could be used since it defines a British Standard Gap as a structure. A path with a Standard Gap behaves more like a fully open path whilst technically containing a structure. The Welsh Office seem to have accepted this and have included it in their guidance.

A Gap as a structure may sound odd, but it ensures that barbed wire etc is clear of the passageway and it can stop motor vehicles (except motorbikes) from using the path.
Top of Page 

Bluebells need your help
3 April 2007
We have lifted this item complete from a Ramblers' Association's newsletter. We are sure they won't mind.

Bluebells have been voted the most popular wild flowers in the UK, where they flower between May and June, but this beautiful bloom may be at risk as its native woodland habitat falls victim to changing climate conditions, agricultural demands and hybridisation.

We [Ramblers] have partnered with the Natural History Museum and Plantlife in making a nationwide plea for people to find, identify and record bluebells in their local area. The records will help build a picture of bluebells in the UK by mapping the distribution of bluebells and revealing when and where bluebells first flower across the country.

When out walking this spring, look out for colonies of bluebells growing in your local area and then log your findings on the Natural History Museum website.


For more information about the project and how to take part see www.ramblers.org.uk/bluebells

Top of Page 

Photo Competition launched
3 April 2007

BADFA would like more photos of paths in our area. So acting on a suggestion from Phil Wadey we set up a working party to see what could be done. The result is the launch yesterday (2 April 2007) of the competition to run till November. We set up a sub-web for this which can be got at as www.badfa.org.uk/photocomp.

Top of Page 

BADFA influences government guidelines
2 April 2007

Widths of paths on Path Orders
The planning inspectorate has guidelines for path inquiries given them by Defra, the government department responsible. The guidance on widths of paths was not fully in line with the statute law. Defra amended the guidance and inadvertently made the position much worse.
So bad was it that the Byways & Bridleways Trust decided to object to all path orders which didn't comply. Defra responded by going out to consultation on it. It was a very limited consultation and had none of the public procedure normal to consultations by Defra. BADFA happened to hear of it and as well as registering our view that the procedure was flawed, we made substantial comment and suggestion for improvement of the guidance.

We are pleased to be able to report that much of what we said has been taken on board, and whilst doubtless others have said some of the same things, we feel our effort was worth while. The guidance is much better than before, clearer and more comprehensive. We are not in agreement with all of it though even now, and we are currently taking up one particular apparent ambiguity in the new text with Defra.

 

  


Top of Page